SpeakFreely
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Science & Technology
  • About
Politics

Understanding Poland: Part 2

by Adam Mazik June 16, 2020
written by Adam Mazik June 16, 2020

The 4th partition

Even with a wild imagination it is hard to imagine a coalition or even a civil cooperation between PO and PiS. The two parties are like two hostile tribes fighting for the electorate. It is a miracle that the aggression and polarisation in the Polish public debate hasn’t led to a battery in the parliament yet.

But how did that happen? Why can’t the two parties representing the vast majority of the Polish population coexist and fight on a meritocratic level? The story begins in 2001.


In the beginning of their existence, in the year 2001 the parties were ideologically relatively close to each other, even forming a coalition for the regional elections in 2002. Both parties were supporters of Poland’s entrance into the EU. Both had a conservative rhetoric, aimed to attack and hurt a common enemy, the SLD, (the party emerged from the “Unified Polish workers party” PZPR, the communist party), which governed Poland between 2001 and 2005. Surprisingly enough both parties were also more economically liberal than they are now, with PiS being the more social option of the two.

The break came in the year 2005, the year of both the parliamentary and presidential elections. After the regional elections and the electoral coalition of the two parties in 2002, many public commentators expected a continuation of the cooperation. The then disgraced SLD ceased to be a relevant option for a government formation, PiS and PO were expected to be the two strongest parties in the next parliament. A big coalition of two ideologically close parties seemed to be the most likely option.

However the campaign demonstrated that the rules of the game were changed. Although still similar in their goals and rhetoric’s, the parties understood the new order of the Polish political scene: They were antagonists. Briefly explained: The main axis of political disagreement between PiS and PO at that time was economic. In the campaign PiS presented an ultimatum for the voter: Polska solidarna, albo Polska liberalna (a social Poland, or a liberal Poland).

PiS won both the parliamentary and presidential elections. The negotiations to form a coalition failed and PiS formed a government with two other parties. In order to understand the current political situation though we need to also look at them.

LPR (The League of Polish Families) was a catholic right wing party, being the only significant political formation opposing Poland’s participation in the EU. Samoobrona, a hard to define social-populist party with both right and left wing elements did not openly oppose the EU, however euro-sceptic sentiments inside the party were not insignificant. The electorate of both parties was traditionalist, anti-elitist and seated mostly in smaller cities and rural areas of Poland. Huge parts of the private media turned very strongly against the government coalition, indirectly, or openly supporting the Civic Platform.

The formed coalition broke up in 2007 with the unstable government, consisting of controversial figures having alienated huge portions of the moderate electorate. In the resulting elections the country was relatively much more motivated to vote, frustrated by the 2005-2007 experience.
The voter turnout amounted to 16.5 million voters (53.9%) versus the 11.8 Million (40.6%) in the year 2005. Both PiS and PO were able to increase their results substantially, however the higher turnout resulted in a crushing win for the Civic Platform. With 6.7 Millions of votes (41.5%) the Civic Platform impressively improved their result from 2005 (3.2 million votes or 24.1%) and went on to form a coalition with PSL, a moderate, conservative agrarian party, which would then govern Poland for the next 8 years.

PiS was able to gather 5.2 Millions votes (32.11%), which also is a significant increase (3.2 Million votes or 27% in 2005). More importantly however despite losing the election, they defeated the two former coalition parties LPR and Samoobrona, who never played a role in Polish politics again.

The elections of 2007 confirmed and cemented the existing duopoly in Poland. While the east of Poland and small cities and rural areas by majority were taken by PiS, the civic platform took the bigger cities and the west. This tendency can be observed today too, with the reservation that PiS was able to win over huge parts of the west, and of the big cities.

Note from Editor: The views and opinions expressed on Speak Freely are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Speak Freely today and its editorial team. Any content provided by our bloggers or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, individual or anyone or anything.

ElectionsPolandPolitical PartiesPolitics
0 comment
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTelegramEmail
Adam Mazik

Adam is 25 years old and studies law in Bonn. He is the Regional Coordinator for the German speaking region in SFL since 2019. His interests are legal history, economics and political philosophy. In his free time Adam likes to play the guitar and to convince people that coriander is terrible.

previous post
George Floyd Protests: Balancing between the two Extremes
next post
Understanding Poland: Part 3

You may also like

Challenges for the First Amendment

A Virtue We Must Cultivate

Why Libertarians Should Care About Special Economic Zones

SFL Alumni Reject Russia’s Aggressions

Liberty, Division, and Vaccination

Crony Island?

The Failures of Appeasement

Covid and Freedom: Then, Now, and Tomorrow

The Demise of Bitcoin Creeping Over the Horizon

Free Expression – Any Exceptions?

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

JOIN OUR WRITING STAFF

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. - George Orwell

RECENT POSTS

  • Breaking Down Breaking Bad’s War on...

    May 24, 2022
  • Challenges for the First Amendment

    May 22, 2022
  • Heroes and Villains: an Interview with...

    May 6, 2022
  • A Virtue We Must Cultivate

    April 26, 2022
  • Why Libertarians Should Care About Special...

    March 27, 2022
  • SFL Alumni Reject Russia’s Aggressions

    February 24, 2022

TAGS

  • Culture (21)
  • Economics (53)
  • Europe (6)
  • History (10)
  • Philosophy (34)
  • Politics (100)
  • Science (3)
  • Society (77)
  • Technology (12)

TO READ

  • Breaking Down Breaking Bad’s War on Drugs

    May 24, 2022
  • Challenges for the First Amendment

    May 22, 2022
  • Heroes and Villains: an Interview with Sean Malone

    May 6, 2022

Instagram

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Why It’s Time to Treat the Hammer and Sickle Like the Swastika

    August 9, 2018
  • 2

    “Free” Health Care Is the Wrong Path for Albania

    May 9, 2019
  • 3

    Liberty, Division, and Vaccination

    February 23, 2022

@2021 - All Right Reserved

SpeakFreely
  • Culture
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Science & Technology
  • About