In any functioning democracy, the people have the final say. That’s the deal. We vote, and our decisions, whether popular or controversial, are supposed to matter. But what happens when the government decides it knows better than the voters?
In November 2024, Missouri voters passed Amendment 3, a constitutional amendment that protected the right to abortion up to the point of fetal viability. It was a big deal, not just for reproductive rights but for democracy itself. The people spoke. Loudly.
And yet, less than a year later, both the courts and the legislature are trying to roll it back. The state Supreme Court blocked its implementation, and lawmakers are pushing a repeal. This isn’t just about abortion. This is about ignoring the will of the people. Missouri’s response to Amendment 3 calls into question whether our democratic system actually works when politicians and judges can toss out results they don’t like.
Amendment 3 was straightforward. It said that Missourians should have the right to make their own reproductive health decisions, including the right to abortion up until fetal viability. It didn’t allow for late-term procedures unless the mother’s life was in danger and was written to match what a majority of Americans already support.
The voters agreed. The amendment passed with about 52 percent of the vote, a clear win in a state where conservative lawmakers have long dominated. This made Missouri the first state to reverse a near-total abortion ban at the ballot box. That matters. It showed a real shift in public opinion and reminded everyone that regular people, not just politicians, can still shape policy.
This was supposed to be a turning point, proof that direct democracy still worked. But that didn’t last long. Instead of implementing the will of the voters, the people in power found ways to delay, challenge, and now potentially undo what the people had decided. It makes you wonder what the point of voting is if your vote can just be ignored.
Right after Amendment 3 passed, abortion providers like Planned Parenthood went to court to get the law enforced. Lower courts sided with them, issuing rulings that allowed abortions to resume in Missouri based on the new constitutional language. It seemed like things were moving in the right direction.
Then the Missouri Supreme Court stepped in, and not in a good way. They didn’t say the amendment was invalid or unconstitutional. Instead, they claimed the lower courts had made procedural errors. On paper, that might sound reasonable, but the impact was anything but. Their decision voided the injunctions and effectively reinstated Missouri’s abortion ban, even though the constitution had been changed by the voters.
Now, abortion is once again inaccessible in the state, despite being protected by the highest legal authority, the state constitution. That’s not just frustrating. It’s infuriating. If the courts can find a technicality to ignore what voters passed, then the whole idea of democracy starts to feel shaky. It sets a dangerous precedent where the courts don’t have to listen to the people if they don’t like the outcome. This wasn’t a ruling based on justice. It was a ruling based on delay, control, and political convenience.
While the courts played the delay game, Missouri lawmakers took a more direct route. They are trying to cancel out Amendment 3 entirely. Just months after it passed, some legislators introduced a new proposal to get a repeal measure on the 2026 ballot. If approved, it would reinstate a near-total abortion ban with only narrow exceptions for cases like rape, incest, or life endangerment.
Republican lawmakers are backing the push, despite the amendment’s recent passage. Let’s be honest. This isn’t about new information or changing circumstances. It’s about elected officials deciding that the people made the wrong choice and trying to undo it. The proposed repeal is almost entirely backed by the same politicians who fought Amendment 3 in the first place. It’s party-line politics at its worst, and it shows a complete lack of respect for voters’ decisions.
Instead of doing the job they were elected to do, representing their constituents, these lawmakers are trying to force their own personal views on everyone else. And they’re doing it in a way that risks making people feel like their votes don’t matter. That’s not how democracy is supposed to work. When the government is more interested in controlling outcomes than honoring public votes, it stops being a government by the people and becomes something else entirely.
What’s happening in Missouri right now goes beyond the abortion debate. This is a full-blown attack on direct democracy. Ballot initiatives exist so regular people can make laws when elected officials won’t. That’s exactly what happened with Amendment 3. But now, the government is using legal loopholes and political power plays to ignore that vote.
That’s dangerous. When people take the time to organize, campaign, and vote only to have it all undone by judges and legislators, it breaks public trust. It sends the message that voters are only in charge when they agree with those in power. And if they don’t, then the rules can be changed.
Missouri’s attempt to reverse a popular vote could easily become a blueprint for other states. If it works here, what’s to stop it from happening elsewhere? Today it’s abortion. Tomorrow it could be voting rights, workers’ protections, or even something as basic as education. Once you open the door to this kind of interference, it’s hard to close it again.
Amendment 3 was supposed to mark a turning point for Missouri. Voters stood up and made their voices heard on one of the most divisive issues of our time. But instead of honoring that decision, the state’s courts and lawmakers have worked overtime to block, delay, and now try to reverse it.
This isn’t just about one amendment. It’s about the bigger picture and whether the people still have power in a democracy. If voter-approved changes to the constitution can be so easily ignored or reversed, then what’s the point of voting at all?
We should all be paying attention to what’s happening in Missouri. The future of direct democracy is on the line, and the only way to protect it is to speak out, stay involved, and hold those in power accountable. If we don’t, we risk losing one of the last tools ordinary people have to fight back.
This piece solely expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the magazine as a whole. SpeakFreely is committed to facilitating a broad dialogue for liberty, representing a variety of opinions. Support freedom and independent journalism by donating today.
