If you go on YouTube and search for “Minecraft working computer”, you will find something exciting: city-sized circuits that can run simple programs. To a non-player, this sounds impossible. How can you “build a computer” in a game about mining and blocks?
The answer is the core of this article. The game’s developer, Mojang, never intended for computers to exist. They didn’t provide a “computer block”. Instead, they provided a few simple LEGO-like tools: a “wire” – Redstone Dust, a red powder you can lay on the ground, and a “power source” – a Redstone Torch, which provides a simple “on” or “off” signal. The enormous gap between the simple tools the developers provided and the stunning, emergent complexity that players created is perhaps the greatest (and maybe most popular) illustration of one of the 20th century’s most important libertarian ideas: F.A. Hayek’s “Knowledge Problem”.
The Planner vs. The People
In his 1945 essay, “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” The Nobel Prize-winning economist F.A. Hayek laid out a simple but profound argument. He claimed that a “central planner” – a government, a committee, or a single dictator – could never efficiently organize a complex economy. This wasn’t because the planners were evil or uneducated. It was because the task itself is impossible.
A planner, Hayek argued, only has access to “statistical” knowledge, but they lack the most crucial information: the “knowledge of the particular time and place” held by millions of individuals. This is the “dispersed knowledge” that makes an economy work: the farmer who knows his specific soil is wet this season, the factory manager who knows her machine is about to break, or the consumer who prefers one good over another. In a free market, this knowledge is coordinated by the price system. If a resource becomes scarce, its price rises, “telephatically” signaling to everyone to use less of it or find a substitute, all without a single person in charge.
Mojang as the Central Planner
This brings us back to Minecraft. The developers at Mojang are the “central planners” of their digital world. They set the game’s basic physics. The limit of their central knowledge and planned intent was for a player to use the redstone to have a door open. It was a simple, top-down solution for a simple problem. They could not possibly have possessed the dispersed, specific knowledge needed to design a machine that works as a computer on its own.
The Player “Market” as the Spontaneous Order
So, how did those complex machines get built? They emerged bottom-up, from the spontaneous order of the player “market”.
It starts with one player. Hayek’s “man on the spot”, who has a specific, local problem: “I just got back from a one-hour mining trip, and I am tired of spending 20 minutes manually sorting cobblestone, iron, coal, and 50 other items into dozens of different chests.”
This player uses their local knowledge to build a clunky, inefficient version of an item sorter using a stream of water. They share this innovation on YouTube (a form of “price signal” or information sharing). The “market” of other players sees it. One player, a Redstone “entrepreneur” like Mumbo Jumbo, uses their local knowledge to improve it by making an overflow-proof version of this sorter. Another player, from a hyper-technical server like SciCraft, advances it by adding different streams and making a “multi-item sorter” that processes thousands of items per hour and even sorts unstackable things like potions.
This is the free market in action: a cycle of competition, iteration, and voluntary cooperation fueled by the dispersed knowledge of millions of individuals. No single person designed the final, hyper-efficient “multi-item sorting system” that is now standard on most servers. It emerged, spontaneously, from the collective, self-interested actions of the community.
The Market’s Success vs. the Planner’s Failure
The most potent proof of Hayek’s thesis in Minecraft is not just the market’s success, but the planner’s failure. Inventory management had been a “local problem” that the Minecraft free market had solved a decade ago. But in 2020, Mojang (the central planner) finally announced its own, official, one-size-fits-all solution: the Bundle. It has been in development hell ever since. It has been delayed, re-worked, and, as of late 2025, finally fully implemented. But the Bundle didn’t solve the storage problem fully; it only worked for 64 items.
The contrast is perfect. The free, unregulated market provided hundreds of “good enough” solutions immediately, which then competed and evolved into the brilliant, complex systems we have today. The “expert” central planner, meanwhile, has spent five years failing to deliver a single, simple item.
The Real-World Lesson
Minecraft is the world’s most popular, playable simulation. It proves that innovation, complexity, and efficiency do not come from a benevolent, all-knowing planner. They emerge from the bottom up. The lesson of Redstone is Hayek’s lesson: the “solution” to our complex, real-world problems (in healthcare, housing, or technology) is not to find a “smarter” planner to design a “Bundle” from the top down. The solution is to set simple, stable rules (like Minecraft’s physics) and get out of the way. Trust the spontaneous, creative, and emergent order of free individuals to solve their own problems.
This piece solely expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the magazine as a whole. SpeakFreely is committed to facilitating a broad dialogue for liberty, representing a variety of opinions. Support freedom and independent journalism by donating today.
